Cottonseed Prices RSS Feed


2018 Cottonseed Prices: April





COTTONSEED MARKET: Across most of the Midsouth, Southeast, and Southwest, cottonseed prices increased marginally during April, rising about $5 per ton in Memphis North, Lubbock North, South Georgia, and North Carolina. Californian cottonseed values ran counter to the rest of the nation with a roughly $5 decline in Corcoran North. These changes reflect the supportive demand-side fundamentals provided by firm prices of competing feeds. The supply side remains suppressive to prices with large national cotton acreage expected to provide just less than seven million tons of cottonseed in 2018/19. The critical supply-side caveat is the rising expectation that West Texas will fail to reach its production potential because of higher-than-normal abandonment and yield losses from the ongoing drought in the Southern Plains.

Spot prices are already showing pronounced signs of the risk of production shortfalls in West Texas. Lubbock North spot prices are now among the highest since before the start of 2017/18 ginning, around $205. West Coast cottonseed values have been exhibiting a much narrower-than-normal carry, indicating the concern West Coast traders have about the ability to supplement West Coast supplies with West Texas shipments in new crop. Historically, spot values during April have held a $25-per-ton premium to gin run values of the same week. This year has deviated from the typical $25 April-to-gin-run carry. The latest survey data collected show a $7 carry, suggesting serious concern over the combination of local and West Texas availability in new crop.

Precipitation has finally fallen in West Texas, though not most heavily in the areas of greatest concern to cotton farmers and not nearly in the quantities needed to alleviate the dryness problems. The implications of the drought extend beyond cottonseed production into competing feed markets, exacerbating the upside price risk via production shortfalls in other regionally grown feed ingredients. Across the rest of the US, however, 2018/19 cottonseed production potential remains high, and the upcoming season is expected to provide another year of high volumes and historically low prices.

In balance, the outlook for US cottonseed prices in neutral to slightly bearish with greater downside price risk possible from a deflation of corn and soybean meal prices, both of which are seen by Informa Economics IEG to be at slight risk of decline. Continuing to support cottonseed’s price outlook are the large numbers of grain consuming animal units in the US. Solid to strong growth rates – driven by meat demand and the typical expansion-contraction cycles in each species – are projected for beef cattle, hogs, and broilers. The support these herd and flock numbers represent are expected to keep competing feed ingredient prices from retracting their support to cottonseed prices.

COTTONSEED BALANCE SHEET: USDA’s Economic Research Service is expected to release its projections for 2018/19 next month. Informa has released its projections, featuring a three-percent year-over-year increase in US cottonseed production and a roughly equally sized increase in usage. Because the cottonseed crushing industry will not likely add any processing capacity in the upcoming marketing year, crushing volumes are projected to remain at their 2017/18 levels. This places a greater importance on exports and feed usage forecasts, with the latter bearing nearly 80 percent of the increases between the two consumptive channels.

Informa’s 2018/19 balance sheet starts with a large beginning stocks projection at 590,000 tons, the largest since 2011/12. This will almost certainly be larger than USDA’s projection, as USDA has maintained a 2017/18 feed, seed, and residual (FSR) forecast at 4.300 million tons, 100,000 tons larger than Informa’s. Reports from the field suggest USDA may be overestimating feed usage, even though feed demand for cottonseed has been sizeable and steady most of the marketing year. Informa’s 2017/18 FSR projection at 4.200 million tons would still be the highest usage since 2006/07. Next year’s imports are expected to closely resemble this year’s, with high domestic availability all but eliminating the incentive to buy from abroad. While Informa’s 2018/19 cotton planted area is forecast to be the highest in seven years, an increase in abandonment from the eight percent assumed in its forecasts would push harvested cotton area below Informa’s projected 12.354 million acres. The main risk in this regard is the West Texas drought. Given 12.354 million planted acres, implied cottonseed production would be 6.945 million tons, the largest since 2006/07.

Because crush capacities were reached this year, next year’s crush volumes are expected to be at 2017/18’s level or, because of 2017/18’s slow start, slightly higher. Old-crop crushing volumes suffered from plants’ operational difficulties during gin run and have failed to meet expectations in each subsequent month. In April, Informa further reduced its 2017/18 crush forecast to 1.900 million tons, 50,000 below USDA’s. New-crop export projections are 115,000 tons larger than 2017/18’s, which were the largest since 2007/08. If realized, 2018/19 exports would be the largest since 2006/07. New-crop ending stocks would therefore be just above old crop’s, at 594,000 tons. This is consistent with the persistence of large stocks in consecutive years of high production and implies a neutral to slightly bearish price outlook for 2018/19.



COTTONSEED fob points COTTONSEED dlvd. points
Cottonseed Supply/Demand Balance Sheet

Cordele South, GA

Cordele South, GA

West Texas

West Texas

Kingston North, NC

Kingston North, NC

Memphis North, TN

Memphis North, TN

Corcoran North, CA

For weekly cottonseed pricing and commentary contact:

Grady Ferguson 901-202-4443

Every effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the information and market data which is provided in this publication as a compilation for the use of its readers. Information has been obtained by Informa Economics IEG from sources believed to be reliable. However, because of the possibility of human or mechanical error, Informa does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information.

Published by Informa Economics IEG, 3464 Washington Drive, Suite 102, Eagan, MN 55122-1438.


Share This: