|
Segmenting consumers by generation is
critical to understanding how different
cohorts approach shopping. The period
when a consumer comes of age not only
shapes the way he or she views shopping
and the importance of apparel and fashion,
but connects a group of consumers who
will share a similar lifestage timeline.
As consumers age, their lives change.
Whether they are going off to college,
starting a family, or retiring, life changes
affect consumers’ apparel shopping habits.
Some shifts in shopping behavior are consistently
linked to aging of consumers —
such as loss of interest in shopping or
decreased spending on apparel. However,
other behavioral shifts are driven by the
current retail climate and tend to cross
generations — such as increased preference
to shop for electronics or increased apparel
purchases in response to price deflation,
resulting in overflowing closets.
| Generational Age Groups |
| |
Ages in 1995 |
Ages in 2004 |
| Generation X |
18–30 |
27–39 |
| Baby Boomers |
31–49 |
40–58 |
| Silent Generation |
50–67 |
59–70* |
This edition of the Textile Consumer focuses
on comparing three generations — Generation
X, the Baby Boomers, and the Silent
Generation — with respect to how their
attitudes toward apparel shopping have
changed from a decade ago. The timeline
to the right shows the years commonly
accepted as defining these generations.
For our analysis of data from Cotton Incorporated’s
Lifestyle Monitor™, we have
used the corresponding age categories
shown in the table below.
Top
Declining Love of Apparel Shopping
Over the past decade, consumers’ love of
shopping for apparel has declined across
the board. In 1995, 53% of Generation X
said they either liked or loved to shop for
apparel, compared with only 42% in 2004.
Shopping enjoyment has experienced similar
double-digit declines among Baby
Boomers and the Silent Generation: in
2004, only 31% and 28% of these groups,
respectively, said they liked or loved to
shop for clothes. Historically, consumers’ love of shopping declines with age; however,
the current retail climate is especially
challenging for the apparel market.
Top
Competing Purchase Options
One challenge faced by apparel retailers
and manufacturers is that consumers are
spending a greater share of their money
on other products and services. For example,
spending is up on cell phones (from
0.2% of expenditures in 1995 to 0.7% in
2004) and medical services (from 20% in
1995 to 23% in 2004). Clothing was left
with only a 4.0% share of consumers’ total
expenditures in 2004, down from 4.9% in
1995. In dollars, this decline in share
equates to a $324 billion loss, according to
personal consumption expenditures data
from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
However, decreased share of expenditures
does not necessarily mean decreased unit
purchases. As consumers have enjoyed a
decade of deflating apparel prices, increased
purchasing power has enabled
them to get more apparel for less.
Top
Shifting Shopping Preferences
Apparel’s share of the consumer wallet
has been reduced not only by increased spending on necessities, but by shifts in discretionary
shopping. When the Monitor asked consumers what
products they preferred to shop for, fewer Gen-Xers
and Baby Boomers opted for apparel than a decade
ago, and more preferred to shop for electronics and
groceries. However, a growing preference for clothes
shopping has emerged in the Silent Generation. In
1995, only 27% of 59- to 70-year-olds (who included
the oldest members of this generation) said they
preferred to shop for clothing, but clothes shopping
was favored by 41% of today’s 59- to 70-year-olds.
The shift in consumers’ shopping preferences is
consistent with a shift in the retail channels at which
they shop. Over the past decade, consumers of all
generations have shifted more of their apparel
shopping to mass merchants and away from morespecialized
channels, such as specialty, department,
and chain stores. The largest shift has been among
Gen-Xers; in 1995, 15% said they shopped for apparel
mostly at mass merchants, but by 2004, the
figure had increased 9 percentage points, to 24%.
The decline has been largest for specialty stores,
as the percentage of Gen-Xers preferring this channel
for clothes shopping fell from 26% in 1995 to 16%
in 2004. Survey data suggest that consumers are
shifting their apparel purchases to mass merchants
because they are shopping this channel for other
products. A solid majority (69%) of shoppers who
bought clothes at mass merchants in 2004 reported
that the last time they did so, they were shopping
for something else.
| Consumers’ Preferred Retail Channels for Apparel |
| |
Chain |
Dept. |
Specialty |
Mass |
| Generation X |
|
|
|
|
| 1995 |
24.7 |
24.9 |
25.6 |
14.9 |
| 2004 |
22.7 |
21.3 |
15.7 |
24.0 |
| Point change |
–2.0 |
–3.6 |
–9.8 |
9.1 |
| Baby Boomers |
|
|
|
|
| 1995 |
28.9 |
25.3 |
11.5 |
19.4 |
| 2004 |
26.5 |
23.3 |
8.0 |
23.1 |
| Point change |
–2.5 |
–2.0 |
–3.5 |
3.7 |
| Silent Generation |
|
|
|
|
| 1995 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
7.3 |
17.9 |
| 2004 |
24.9 |
29.7 |
7.0 |
21.4 |
| Point change |
–5.2 |
–0.4 |
–0.3 |
3.5 |
Just as critical as shifting shopping preferences is
declining interest in apparel. Consistently across all generations, an increasing percentage of consumers
say they are less interested in clothes than they
used to be. In 2004, this attitude was reported by
51% of Generation X (up from 42% in 1996), 57% of
Baby Boomers (up from 54%), and 78% of the Silent
Generation (up from 65%).
Consumers’ declining interest in apparel shopping
likely is related to the significant increase in the
percentage of consumers, across generations, who
say they have too many clothes and do not need to
shop for more. Reporting overflowing closets in
2004 were 38% of Gen-Xers (up 12 points from 1996),
51% of Boomers (up 17 points), and 69% of the
Silent Generation (up 17 points). Consumers seem
to have reached a wardrobe saturation point as a
result of the availability of inexpensive apparel
offerings.

Another factor that could have lessened consumers’
desire to shop for apparel is an apparent shift away
from shopping as a social pastime. From 1995 to
2004, fewer consumers say they are asked for advice
on clothing (43% of Gen-Xers, down 5 points, and
33% of Boomers, down 5 points), and fewer say
they feel better about their apparel purchases when
they have a second opinion (51% of Gen-Xers, down
12 points, and 42% of Boomers, down 6 points).
These declines suggest that fewer consumers are
sharing their clothes-shopping experiences with
others.
Top
Effects of Waning Interest
The declining interest in apparel shopping manifests
itself in many ways. Shopping more than one retail channel (cross-shopping) has declined across all
three generations, consistent with a lack of interest
in shopping for apparel, but also indicating increased
loyalty to consumers’ preferred channels. Of Gen-
Xers, 21% shop only one channel for apparel (up
10 points from 1997), as do 27% of Baby Boomers
(up 13 points) and 26% of the Silent Generation (up
6 points).
Capturing consumers’ attention continues to be a
challenge. Another effect of decreased interest in
apparel shopping is the declining percentage of
consumers who look to external sources for apparel
ideas. The number-one idea generator is what shoppers
already own and know they like (cited by 71%
of Gen-Xers and 70% of the Baby Boom and Silent
generations); this is one of the few idea sources that
has remained stable since 1995. Meanwhile, the
percentage of consumers who rely on in-store displays
and salespeople, people they see regularly,
or commercials and ads has declined significantly
across all generations. The declining use of in-store
displays and salespeople is consistent with the shift
to mass merchants and the decline in crossshopping.
Overall declines in the use of idea generators
have significant implications for marketing
opportunities, both in-store and through the media.
Advertising on the Internet may be an increasingly
important way to reach consumers, as the percentage
of shoppers browsing the Web for apparel has grown
since 1997. Gen-Xers are the most likely to look for
apparel on line (33%, up from 6% in 1997), followed
by Boomers (24%, up from 4%) and the Silent Generation
(10%, up from 3%). On-line browsing may
have helped decrease the time consumers spend in
the store per clothes-shopping trip. Compared with
1997, the average time in the store is down 3.5
minutes for Gen-Xers and 8.1 minutes for Boomers,
while remaining about the same (up less than a
minute) for the Silent Generation.
Top
Enduring Love of Denim
While consumers’ love of apparel shopping has
declined, their love of denim has remained constant.
The majority of consumers in 2004, as in 1995, say
they “like or love” wearing denim, and consumers
continue to own a collection of denim garments— on average, 15.9 items for Gen-Xers, 14.5 for Baby
Boomers, and 11.0 for the Silent Generation. Already
at high levels in 1995, denim ownership by Gen-
Xers increased the least, by 0.3 garments, while
Boomers added 1.3 garments, and the Silent Generation
added 1.1. Jeans were the most popular denim
item in 1995 and continue to account for about half
of all denim items owned, regardless of generation.
When purchasing denim jeans, consumers overall
are mostly concerned with being practical, rather
than looking good, an attitude that has held true
for the past decade. Among men, a solid majority
is most interested in practicality when buying jeans
(71% in 2004, up 5 points from 1995). However, the
last decade has seen a significant increase in the
percentage of women whose main concern when
buying denim jeans is to look good (49%, up 4
points). This shift was due mostly to Gen-Xers, of whom 53.6% are now most concerned with looking
good (up 6.5 points). No significant shift was seen
for Baby Boomers (45.6%, up 2.5 points) or the Silent
Generation (47.6%, down 0.3 points).

The shift toward buying denim to look good is
consistent with the current trend toward premiumpriced
denim. However, not all consumers are willing
to pay premium prices for jeans. The cohorts
differ clearly in the average prices they say they
would pay for a pair of good-fitting denim jeans:
$34.86 for Gen-Xers, $30.26 for Boomers, and $26.34
for the Silent Generation. The percentage of Gen-
Xers willing to pay over $70.00 was up from 3% in
1998 to 6% in 2004, while the percentages for other
generations remained the same. The average highest
price Gen-Xers have ever paid for a pair of jeans is
$49.99, compared with $40.84 for Boomers and
$34.68 for the Silent Generation. But even with the
rise of premium-priced denim, consumers say they
would pay less today than in 1998 for a good-fitting
pair of jeans (down $1.00 for Gen-Xers and the Silent
Generation and $0.90 for Boomers), mainly as a
result of apparel price deflation. Nonetheless, based
on retail sales data from STS Market Research, prices
have fallen less for denim jeans than for other
apparel categories.

Top
Cross-Generational Challenges to Retailers
Generational segmentation of the consumer base is
pivotal to a successful business. However, apparel
retailers and manufacturers face an uphill battle to
recapture the interest of consumers across generations.
Many issues currently faced by the industry,
such as competition from other product categories,
consumers’ loss of interest in shopping for apparel,
and market saturation, span all consumer generations.
Capturing consumers’ attention and dollars
will require innovative, fashionable apparel that
will get them back into the mood to shop. Premium
denim, though most attractive to Generation X, is
an example of a product that has piqued consumers’ interest and keeps them wanting more.
|