HOME    SITE MAP    CONTACT US
GO
about cotton

Crop Quality Summary Crop Quality Summary

1999 Final Crop Quality Summary


The tables and graphs on the following pages give a summary of the quality of the 1999 USA upland cotton crop.  These data were obtained from the weekly reports issued by the USDA (United States Quality of Cotton Classed under Smith-Doxey Act-- Agricultural Marketing Service, Cotton Division, United States Department of Agriculture, Memphis, Tennessee).

The upper portion of each chart lists, by classing office, the percentage of bales that were placed in various grades by the classers.  The "White Grades" section has three columns that give the percentages of bales placed into grades 11, 21, or 31 (MID+), 41 (SLM), and grades 51, 61, or 71 (LM-).  The "TOTal" column gives the total percentage of bales classified as "white" at each classing office.  The "Light Spotted Grades" section gives percentages of bales classified into groups 12, 22, or 32 (MID+), 42 (SLM), and 52 or 62 (LM-).  The "TOTal" column gives the total percentage of bales classified as "Light Spotted" at each classing office.  The "Other Grades" column includes all bales at each classing office that were classed as "Spotted", "Tinged", "Yellow Stained", or "Below Grade".  The "% Barky Grades" column lists the percentage of bales from each classing office containing bark.

In 1993, the classer grading system was changed.  Under the old system of grading, the classer determined a composite grade of color and trash content; and bales that contained bark and grass were reduced one or more grade levels.  Under this system, the classer determines a color grade, a leaf (trash) grade and notes whether there is bark or grass present in the bale without any reduction in grade. Each color grade percentage will include all levels of leaf.  For example, the 56.9% of the bales classed in Florence, SC in 1999 with SLM white color grade includes all bales at all leaf levels (2-7 leaf) with SLM white color.

The lower portion of the chart lists average physical properties at each classing office.  Micronaire (MIC), length (LEN), length uniformity index (LUI), strength (STR) and TRASH are measurements taken by the High Volume Instruments (HVI).  The TRASH measurement is an estimate of the percent of the surface of the sample covered by the trash.  The maturity ratio and fineness data are derived from random samples submitted each week by classing office and tested using the Shirley Fineness and Maturity Tester (FMT).  

The charts that follow (pg. 6 - 7) give a visual picture of the averages by classing office, for micronaire, strength, length and length uniformity index.  Distributions (pg. 8 -10) of the US crop for micronaire, strength, length, length uniformity index, and color grade follow the classing office charts.



QUALITY SUMMARY OF 1999 U.S. UPLAND COTTON
PERCENT OF BALES
CLASSING WHITEGRADES LIGHT SPOTTED GRADES OTHER BARKY
OFFICE MID+ SLM LM- TOT MID+ SLM LM- TOT GRADES GRADES
Florence, SC 25.5 56.9 5.1 87.5 1.9 7.8 2.2 11.9 0.6 1.5
Macon, GA 23.3 51.2 6.3 80.8 1.6 12.8 3.7 18.1 1.1 1.9
Birmingham,AL 42.9 37.3 1.7 81.9 7.0 9.8 0.8 17.6 0.5 2.9
Rayville, LA 58.0 30.5 1.4 89.9 4.0 5.1 0.6 9.7 0.4 0.4
Memphis, TN 70.0 14.1 1.2 85.3 6.5 5.9 1.1 13.5 1.2 0.2
Dumas, AR 55.2 30.8 2.1 88.1 4.8 5.7 1.1 11.6 0.3 0.6
C. Christi, TX 50.1 18.6 2.5 71.2 13.1 8.2 2.0 23.3 5.5 10.5
Abilene, TX 79.6 2.5 0.0 82.1 15.9 1.0 0.0 16.9 1.0 3.1
Lubbock, TX 93.8 0.3 0.0 94.1 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.5 2.7
Lamesa, TX 88.2 0.1 0.0 88.3 10.3 0.0 0.0 10.3 1.4 2.4
Phoenix, AZ 93.2 1.1 0.0 94.3 4.8 0.6 0.0 5.4 0.3 4.0
Visalia, CA 98.0 0.9 0.0 98.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.1
AVERAGE 65.3 20.4 1.8 87.5 5.7 4.8 1.0 11.5 1.0  
 
   MIC LEN L.UI STR TRASH MAT FIN LGRD NO. LEN
   unit 32/in (%) g/t (%) RATIO mtex INDEX BALES* inch
Florence, SC 4.3 34.5 81.2 28.0 0.39 0.92 177 3.4 1,201,023 1.08
Macon, GA 4.6 33.8 81.0 28.3 0.44 0.98 182 3.4 1,531,218 1.06
Birmingham,AL 4.5 33.5 80.9 27.7 0.38 0.96 178 3.2 712,469 1.05
Rayville, LA 4.7 34.0 81.3 27.8 0.35 1.00 183 2.9 969,351 1.06
Memphis, TN 4.7 34.4 81.9 28.6 0.33 0.97 192 2.8 1,959,819 1.08
Dumas, AR 4.6 34.4 81.7 28.2 0.35 0.98 183 3.0 2,077,005 1.08
C. Christi, TX 4.4 33.9 81.4 26.2 0.35 0.94 175 3.0 1,187,670 1.06
Abilene, TX 4.2 32.8 80.3 27.3 0.24 0.95 166 2.4 848,035 1.03
Lubbock, TX 4.2 32.7 81.0 28.0 0.25 0.94 173 2.5 2,355,395 1.02
Lamesa, TX 4.2 33.1 80.8 28.2 0.22 0.94 170 2.3 623,870 1.03
Phoenix, AZ 4.7 35.3 81.0 27.6 0.17 1.00 188 2.0 842,279 1.10
Visalia, CA 4.0 36.3 82.5 31.7 0.20 0.94 154 2.2 1,465,110 1.13
AVERAGE 4.43 34.1 81.4 28.3 0.31 0.96 177 2.8 15,773,244 1.06

QUALITY SUMMARY OF 1998 U.S. UPLAND COTTON
PERCENT OF BALES
CLASSING WHITEGRADES LIGHT SPOTTED GRADES OTHER BARKY
OFFICE MID+ SLM LM- TOT MID+ SLM LM- TOT GRADES GRADES
Florence, SC 47.8 39.5 0.9 88.2 5.8 5.3 0.2 11.3 0.5 1.7
Macon, GA 16.1 38.0 4.2 58.3 3.6 26.7 8.4 38.7 3.0 2.9
Birmingham,AL 35.1 19.9 2.1 57.1 8.0 19.5 8.5 36.0 6.9 2.9
Rayville, LA 16.6 36.7 1.7 55.0 5.5 31.2 4.4 41.1 3.9 0.7
Memphis, TN 24.6 32.9 5.7 63.2 7.1 20.5 7.6 35.2 1.6 1.2
Dumas, AR 28.4 40.6 1.3 70.3 6.4 20.3 2.0 28.7 1.0 1.3
C. Christi, TX 78.2 6.8 2.2 87.2 5.6 2.6 3.3 11.5 1.3 0.5
Abilene, TX 49.4 14.5 0.7 64.6 19.4 7.4 4.3 31.1 4.3 13.6
Lubbock, TX 56.5 15.1 0.0 71.6 23.4 3.5 0.0 26.9 1.5 9.8
Lamesa, TX 72.1 8.3 0.1 80.5 17.6 1.1 0.0 18.7 0.8 6.4
Phoenix, AZ 86.6 6.1 0.2 92.9 5.2 1.6 0.1 6.9 0.2 5.2
Visalia, CA 72.2 18.4 1.6 92.2 3.6 2.0 0.4 6.0 1.8 0.2
AVERAGE 43.9 26.8 1.9 72.6 9.5 12.8 3.2 25.5 1.9  
 
   MIC LEN L.UI STR TRASH MAT FIN LGRD NO. LEN
   unit 32/in (%) g/t (%) RATIO mtex INDEX BALES* inch
Florence, SC 4.6 34.2 81.6 27.9 0.42 0.97 187 3.5 1,474,051 1.07
Macon, GA 4.6 34.1 80.8 27.2 0.42 0.97 177 3.1 1,515,696 1.07
Birmingham,AL 4.4 34.2 81.0 27.2 0.41 0.95 175 3.0 595,130 1.07
Rayville, LA 4.9 34.5 81.4 27.8 0.37 1.00 185 3.2 669,816 1.08
Memphis, TN 4.5 34.7 81.8 27.1 0.43 0.95 181 3.4 1,676,511 1.08
Dumas, AR 4.6 34.6 81.6 27.6 0.40 0.97 181 3.3 1,739,307 1.08
C. Christi, TX 4.6 32.5 81.2 26.5 0.21 1.00 176 2.4 535,479 1.02
Abilene, TX 4.4 33.8 80.8 27.7 0.31 0.97 174 2.8 503,066 1.06
Lubbock, TX 4.2 33.2 80.8 27.8 0.36 0.92 167 3.4 2,184,735 1.04
Lamesa, TX 4.3 33.6 80.9 27.7 0.3 0.94 170 2.9 361,199 1.05
Phoenix, AZ 4.6 35.5 80.9 28.5 0.19 1.01 175 2.3 717,380 1.11
Visalia, CA 4.1 36.9 82.7 33.0 0.31 0.98 153 3.2 1,039,414 1.15
AVERAGE 4.5 34.3 81.3 28.0 0.37 0.96 175 3.2 13,011,784 1.07

Averages for Selected Fiber Properties by Classing Office

Average Micronaire
Average Strength
To view full-size chart, click on thumbnail image.
Select your browser back button to return to this page

 

Average  Staple Length
Average Length Uniformity
To view full-size chart, click on thumbnail image.
Select your browser back button to return to this page

 


Distributions of Fiber Properties 

Micronaire Distribution
Strength Distribution
 
To view full-size chart, click on thumbnail image.
Select your browser back button to return to this page

 

Length Distribution
LUI Distribution
 
To view full-size chart, click on thumbnail image.
Select your browser back button to return to this page

    

Leaf Grade Distribution
 
Color Grade Distribution

 

To view full-size chart, click on thumbnail image.
Select your browser back button to return to this page

Most Popular Varieties for 1999 by State

Location Variety Percent of
Acreage
SOUTHEAST
Virginia Stoneville ST474 11
North Carolina Stoneville BXN 47 13
South Carolina Deltapine DP 458 B/BR 42
Georgia Deltapine DP 655 B/RR 16
Florida Deltapine Nucotton 33 33
Alabama Deltapine Nucotton 33 23
MIDSOUTH
Louisiana Deltapine Nucotton 33 36
Mississippi Deltapine DP 458 B/RR 49
Arkansas Stoneville BXN 47 41
Tennessee Paymaster PM 1220 BG/RR 41
Missouri Stoneville BXN 47 30
SOUTHWEST
Texas Paymaster PM 2326 RR 18
Oklahoma Paymaster PM 1220 BG/RR 28
FARWEST
New Mexico Acala 1517-91 30
Arizona Deltapine Nucotton 33 31
California CPCSD Acala MAXXA 44


Changes In USDA Cotton Classing Offices -- 1999

For the 1999 season, there are 12 USDA cotton classing offices located throughout the cotton production regions of the USA.  The classing office previously located in Hayti, MO has been closed and the classing operations consolidated with offices in nearby regions.  This is part of a long-term plan by the USDA Cotton Programs to reduce the total number of cotton classing offices.

Shown below is a map of the USDA Cotton Classing Offices for the 1999 crop season.

  

COTTON INCORPORATED
Michael D. Watson

Fiber Quality Research
April 05, 2000
and click here for the Adobe Acrobat version of this report

 

 

 




 
 

POWER SEARCH    FABRIC LIBRARY    DID YOU KNOW?    MEET COTTON CHARACTERS    LOOK AT OUR ADS    POST CARDS    DOWNLOAD MUSIC    HOME    TERMS & CONDITIONS    PRIVACY POLICY    UPDATE EMAIL PROFILE

© 2009 Cotton Incorporated. All rights reserved; America's Cotton Producers and Importers.